TL;DR:
- Pete Buttigieg defends his comments on transgender athletes after receiving criticism from LGBTQ+ advocates.
- He calls for compassion over political spectacle, especially for vulnerable trans youth.
- Buttigieg supports local decision-making on participation rather than sweeping federal bans.
- He highlights the issue’s misuse as a political wedge to divide and harm communities.
- Medical experts say science alone won’t solve the debate; cultural and emotional factors are at play.

Former Transportation Secretary Pete Buttigieg isn’t here for the political circus—and he’s making it crystal clear. After facing heat for his recent comments on transgender girls in sports, Buttigieg took a calm yet cutting stand in a chat with influencer and legal eagle Aaron Parnas, dragging political opportunists and pleading for compassion over culture wars.
“I see this issue being used to divide,” Buttigieg said, live on Substack. “It’s especially hurtful for trans people and people with transgender members of their family who witness themselves or people they love being used as a political football.”
And let’s be real: when Buttigieg calls it out, you listen.
In his earlier interview, the openly gay former mayor and presidential hopeful referred to transgender inclusion in girls’ sports as a question of “fairness”—language that rubbed some LGBTQ+ allies the wrong way, echoing Republican talking points. But this week, Buttigieg took the mic back with a smoother, smarter tone: fairness doesn’t mean fear-mongering, and definitely not federal bans.
“We’re talking about one of the smallest, most vulnerable minorities in the world,” he explained. “And to bridge these divides, we have to take everyone seriously—yes, even the nervous parents—but never at the expense of trans kids’ dignity.”
“Let the Leagues Decide”
Buttigieg doubled down on his belief that these questions belong in community conversations—not Congress. “Those questions should be handled by communities and by sports leagues and not by politicians,” he stated. Translation: keep the Washington grandstanding out of our locker rooms.
With Trump’s administration pushing policies that bar transgender women from women’s sports, Buttigieg’s middle-path stance is more than just talk. He’s threading the needle—acknowledging the fears some parents have, but making sure trans kids aren’t tossed aside like yesterday’s headlines.
And the numbers back it up: out of over 500,000 college athletes, fewer than 10 are openly trans. So why the moral panic? That’s exactly the kind of disproportionate outrage Pete’s trying to dismantle.
What the Science Says—and Doesn’t
Experts say the science isn’t black and white. Dr. Bradley Anawalt, an endocrinologist at the University of Washington, explained that while hormone therapy narrows the athletic gap between cis and trans women, some differences—like strength—persist.
“Science alone may never give us a perfect answer,” he admitted. “We all have inherent inequalities. The bigger question is: how do we embrace everyone while maintaining a level playing field?”
Even Buttigieg knows not all sports are created equal. “Chess is different from weightlifting,” he noted, snapping reality back into a debate that’s often far too abstract.
Why This Matters for the Queer Community
For the LGBTQ community, especially for transgender youth, this debate is exhausting—and dangerous. Every viral soundbite or proposed ban chips away at their humanity. Buttigieg’s push to cool the rhetoric and center empathy may not be perfect, but it’s a hell of a lot better than the scorched-earth tactics coming from the right.
By inviting honest dialogue while rejecting discrimination, he’s offering something rare in 2025 politics: a nuanced position. And while some progressives may wish he hit harder, many see his stance as a valuable shield in a country where trans kids are still under siege.
Because here’s the tea: when trans girls are kept off the field, it’s not just about trophies—it’s about telling an entire group they don’t belong. And that’s not “fairness.” That’s erasure.
So yes, Pete’s comments stirred the pot—but he’s trying to simmer it down, not boil it over. And in a year full of screaming matches, sometimes a firm, calm voice is the most radical thing of all.