blank blank

Mark Zuckerberg’s New Stance: DEI Programs Scrapped, Anti-LGBTQ+ Protections Loosened

Meta’s latest moves include cutting DEI programs & easing LGBTQ+ protections. Critics call it a dangerous pivot.
(1) Kara Swisher moderating a panel in Washington, DC; (2) Mark Zuckerberg, CEO of Meta, is sworn in to the Senate Judiciary Committee hearing in 2024.

Kara Swisher, a prominent journalist and tech industry expert, has delivered a scathing critique of Mark Zuckerberg’s recent decisions at Meta. Her comments, shared on Threads, highlighted Zuckerberg’s alignment with political forces that oppose inclusivity and equality, raising alarms about the company’s shifting priorities. Swisher did not mince words, accusing Zuckerberg of blaming former COO Sheryl Sandberg for Facebook’s inclusivity initiatives, which are now being dismantled under his leadership.

The controversy stems from a reported meeting between Zuckerberg and Donald Trump’s team, where the Meta CEO allegedly assured his commitment to not obstructing the Trump administration’s agenda. As part of this, Meta announced the termination of its diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) programs and the easing of fact-checking measures, including protections against anti-LGBTQ+ hate speech. Critics view this as a capitulation to political pressures, a move that risks eroding years of progress toward creating safer online spaces for marginalized communities.

Swisher underscored the potential harm to the LGBTQ+ community, which has relied on platforms like Facebook and Instagram for visibility and connection. “Allowing hate speech to proliferate unchecked creates an environment of fear and silencing,” she wrote, emphasizing that this shift undermines Meta’s earlier commitments to inclusion. The rollback of DEI programs further signals a troubling trend in tech, where diversity and inclusion are deprioritized in favor of appeasing political actors.

The implications for the LGBTQ+ community are profound. Meta’s platforms have been pivotal in amplifying queer voices, organizing activism, and fostering dialogue. The removal of protective measures not only endangers these efforts but could embolden hate speech and discrimination. Swisher’s critique serves as a rallying call to hold tech giants accountable for their social responsibilities, particularly toward vulnerable groups that depend on their platforms for safety and advocacy.

50% LikesVS
50% Dislikes
Add a comment