In a move that has attracted global attention and criticism, the Parliament of Ghana has recently passed a highly controversial anti-LGBTQ+ bill. This legislation, which has been in the pipeline for three years, marks a significant step back for the LGBTQ+ community and their supporters in Ghana. The bill not only criminalizes individuals identifying as LGBTQ+ but also extends to penalize those who support the community, including activities related to promotion, funding, and even public displays of affection.
The Impact on Rights and Freedoms
The enactment of this legislation has led to a wave of condemnation from the international community and various human rights organizations. A coalition of human rights activists has voiced that the bill grossly violates fundamental human rights, including dignity, freedom of speech, and association, and the rights to partake in processions, academic freedom, equality, and non-discrimination. This stance is supported by the fact that Ghana has, until now, been perceived as a beacon of human rights respect in comparison to many of its African counterparts.
A Divided Perspective
While the bill has sparked outrage among rights groups and the international community, its sponsors and proponents view it differently. Lawmaker Sam George, one of the bill’s sponsors, expressed relief at its passing, suggesting that it lifts a burden from his shoulders. The defense of the bill hinges on the argument that it seeks to protect children and victims of abuse. Furthermore, the lawmakers behind this bill claim to have consulted with influential religious leaders in Ghana, including the Christian Council of Ghana, the Ghana Catholic Bishops’ Conference, and the country’s chief imam, all of whom have reportedly endorsed the legislation.
This divisive bill now sits on the president’s desk, awaiting his signature to become law. The decision could either reinforce Ghana’s commitment to traditional values as argued by its proponents or significantly tarnish the country’s reputation regarding human rights and freedoms, as feared by its critics.