TL;DR
- Over 100 MPs oppose the EHRC code.
- Critics warn it could segregate trans people.
- The code follows a controversial Supreme Court ruling.
- Nadia Whittome leads the charge against the code.
- Public support for trans rights is growing.
In a bold stand for trans rights, more than 100 MPs have banded together to challenge the Equality and Human Rights Commission’s (EHRC) draft Code of Practice, which critics argue could lead to the exclusion and segregation of trans individuals from essential services. The motion, spearheaded by Labour MP Nadia Whittome, has garnered significant attention, with signatories reported to be anywhere from 104 to 108 MPs, showcasing a growing concern over the implications of this code.
Whittome didn’t mince words, stating, “The Code will exclude trans people from services and facilities that they have long used without issue, putting them at increased risk of harassment and violence, and effectively pushing them out of public life.” This isn’t just a minor tweak in policy; it’s a potential overhaul that could enforce segregation based on biological definitions of gender, a move that many see as regressive and harmful.
The draft code, which was laid before Parliament on May 21, 2026, comes in the wake of a UK Supreme Court ruling from April 2025. This ruling controversially defined the terms “woman” and “sex” in the Equality Act 2010 strictly in biological terms, suggesting that facilities like toilets and hospital wards should be segregated based on biological sex. Trans individuals would be relegated to using accessible, lockable, or unisex toilets, a solution that many see as inadequate and discriminatory.
As the debate heats up, Whittome and her supporters are rallying the public and fellow MPs to reject this guidance. A spokesperson from the Trans+ Solidarity Alliance stated, “More than a hundred MPs have signed and made it clear that this code is unjust, unworkable and unacceptable. Trans people across the country are looking to their MP to join this growing chorus to reject the guidance.” The urgency of their message is clear: a bathroom ban is not the way forward for equality.
Disability Rights UK has also weighed in, warning that the updated code sets a dangerous precedent that could weaken protected characteristics and further ostracize trans and intersex people from public life. This is not just about bathrooms; it’s about the fundamental rights of individuals to access services without fear of segregation or discrimination.
As the EHRC chair and chief executive prepare to face the Women and Equalities Committee to discuss the draft guidance, the public is left wondering: will MPs stand firm in their support for trans rights, or will this code slip through the cracks, ushering in an era of enforced segregation? The stakes are high, and the community is watching closely.
https://twitter.com/share?text=https://www.thepinknews.com/2026/06/10/ehrc-single-sex-code-2026/