TL;DR
- Idaho proposes DNA testing to enforce trans bathroom law.
- Trans individuals must use facilities of assigned sex at birth.
- Law could lead to criminal charges for non-compliance.
- Concerns raised about safety and privacy violations.
- Legal challenges are underway against the law.
Idaho is making headlines for all the wrong reasons. In a shocking display of legislative overreach, state officials have proposed using DNA testing to enforce a new bathroom law that targets transgender individuals. Yes, you heard that right—DNA testing. It’s a move that raises eyebrows and serious concerns about privacy and safety.
Under this controversial law, which is set to take effect on July 1, transgender people will be required to use public bathrooms and changing facilities that correspond with the sex they were assigned at birth. And if you think that’s bad, it gets worse: those who “knowingly and wilfully” enter the wrong bathroom could face criminal charges, with repeat offenders risking up to five years in prison. Talk about a harsh penalty for just wanting to relieve oneself!
During a recent court hearing, US District Judge Amanda Brailsford questioned how Idaho officials plan to enforce this draconian law, especially since many trans individuals now carry IDs that match their true gender. Enter Idaho Solicitor General Michael Zarian, who suggested that DNA testing could be a solution. “It shouldn’t be too difficult because there is DNA testing,” he claimed, implying that trans individuals might not even need to consent to such tests. Can you imagine being asked to provide DNA just to use the restroom? It’s absurd!
Lambda Legal attorney Kell Olson, who is representing six trans individuals challenging this law, pointed out the glaring flaws in Zarian’s reasoning. “DNA testing usually requires a warrant,” he noted, emphasizing that this law does nothing but endanger the lives of trans people. “HB 752 does make Idaho less safe for transgender people. It threatens serious and immediate harm, no matter what trans people do,” Olson stated, and he’s absolutely right.
Imagine this: you’re out with your family at a restaurant, and suddenly you have to weigh the risks of using the bathroom. Do you go into the men’s room and risk being arrested, or do you enter the women’s room and face potential harassment or worse? It’s a horrifying dilemma that no one should have to face.
ACLU of Idaho attorney Emily Croston also chimed in, questioning the feasibility of identifying someone’s biological sex based on appearance. “Are we just going to look at folks as they enter a restroom and determine whether we think they look enough like a man or a woman? That’s ridiculous,” she said. And she’s right; this law is not only impractical but also deeply harmful.
As the legal battle unfolds, one thing is clear: Idaho’s bathroom bill is a dangerous precedent that threatens the safety and dignity of trans individuals. The LGBTQ+ community deserves better than this invasive and discriminatory legislation. It’s time to stand up and fight back against such blatant violations of rights. We’ll be watching closely as this story develops, but for now, it’s a stark reminder that the fight for equality is far from over.
https://twitter.com/share?text=https://www.thepinknews.com/2026/06/11/idaho-dna-bathroom-law/