In the tranquil town of Littleton, New Hampshire, where political polarization runs deep, a heated debate has emerged surrounding public art and its potential to promote LGBTQ+ ideals. This picturesque community, equally divided between liberal and conservative residents, is grappling with the implications of a controversial public mural that has sparked a culture war within its borders.
The controversy ignited when a local councilor raised objections at a town meeting about a three-piece public mural funded by various local organizations, including a Pride group. This “diversity mural” featured elements like flowers, trees, a rainbow color wheel, and a subtle nod to defying book bans. The titles of the pieces were “We will not be Banned,” “We are Joy,” and “We Belong.”
Conservative-leaning members of the three-person town council voiced their concerns about the artwork, prompting town manager Jim Gleason to consider restrictions on certain forms of public art. While the exact criteria for these restrictions remain unclear, discussions have predominantly revolved around artwork with LGBTQ+ themes.
After exploring their legal options, Gleason acknowledged that banning specific types of artwork could potentially breach constitutional law. This leaves the town with a challenging decision: either ban all public art or navigate the complexities of constitutional litigation.
Town council member Carrie Gendreau, also a Republican state senator for New Hampshire, has been a vocal critic of murals like this. Her personal beliefs, including describing homosexuality as an “abomination,” have ignited strong opposition within Littleton. In September, hundreds of residents attended a town meeting to reject Gendreau’s views.
Local organizations and residents fear that the town may indeed impose a blanket ban on public art, which has raised concerns about the community’s inclusivity and the potential economic repercussions. Jordan Applewhite, a resident who owns a bar and restaurant in Littleton, remarked, “That doesn’t feel like responsible government.”
While acknowledging that the controversy surrounding public art is deeply rooted in societal views and LGBTQ+ issues, Gleason emphasizes the importance of not restricting art based on personal preferences. The town now faces a pivotal decision: whether to stifle artistic expression or navigate the complexities of cultural divides within their borders.