In the ever-evolving landscape of LGBTQ-inclusive education, a high school statistics teacher in Florida, Brian Kerekes, found himself in a unique dilemma. When a student queried his sexual orientation, Kerekes hesitated to respond, citing the state’s recent legislation constraining LGBTQ-related discussions in schools. This incident underscores the far-reaching impact of Florida’s expanded Parental Rights in Education act, commonly dubbed the “Don’t Say Gay” law. The law has led to a series of challenging situations for LGBTQ teachers like Kerekes, as well as their colleagues.
Across the United States, debates about LGBTQ-inclusive curricula and policies are heating up, often fueled by conservative activists’ concerns. In Florida, the contentious battle over the Don’t Say Gay bill attracted national attention. While initially focusing on younger students, the law has been broadened, limiting discussions on sexual orientation and gender identity across various grade levels. This law is not an isolated case, as multiple states, including Arkansas, Indiana, Iowa, Kentucky, and North Carolina, have also enacted restrictions on LGBTQ-related education this year.
These legislative actions have sparked fear and uncertainty among educators. Becky Pringle, President of the National Education Association, noted the growing culture of apprehension within the teaching community. As teachers grapple with unprecedented challenges, including the pandemic’s aftermath and low morale, these new laws compound their worries. The situation is causing a teacher shortage, further exacerbated by educators’ concerns about their autonomy and expertise being undermined.
The effects of these policies extend to students as well. LGBTQ students like Lola from Winter Haven, Florida, are finding it harder to express their identities openly due to the chilling effect of these laws. Advocates emphasize that these restrictive measures have adverse effects on mental health. Research from The Trevor Project underscores the importance of LGBTQ-inclusive protective factors in schools, such as gender-neutral bathrooms, LGBTQ-inclusive history lessons, and supportive teachers. These factors have been shown to significantly reduce suicide attempt rates among LGBTQ students.
Despite the obstacles, some educators remain determined to create safe spaces. Brian Kerekes, for instance, is steadfast in his commitment to continue his school’s Gender-Sexuality Alliance club despite potential challenges. The struggles faced by LGBTQ teachers and students highlight the ongoing tension between conservative perspectives on education and the imperative to create inclusive and supportive learning environments for all.
These legislative battles remind us that the fight for inclusive education remains a crucial and evolving front in the broader struggle for LGBTQ rights.