Naasik A. Fuller, a nonbinary former employee of Mazzoni Center, is appealing an unfavorable decision by an unemployment compensation referee who denied their request for unemployment benefits. Represented by attorney Justin F. Robinette, Fuller is challenging the ruling made by referee Jay M. Apfelbaum on November 17, which deemed them ineligible for benefits due to an alleged workplace incident where Fuller was accused of being intentionally disruptive.
Fuller, 31, who served as a community health worker/care coordinator at Mazzoni’s Bainbridge Street office for approximately five months, contends they were unjustly fired in June 2023 and treated unfairly during their employment and the subsequent unemployment hearing. Their attorney asserts that the appeal aims to reverse the decision, highlighting issues of fairness and opportunity for nonbinary individuals.
During the unemployment hearing, witnesses from Mazzoni, including Karen Kessler, Faith Mole, and Michael Ramirez, testified against Fuller, asserting that they failed to meet workplace expectations. These testimonies were central to the decision denying Fuller unemployment benefits. Mazzoni Center was represented by attorney Geoffrey D. Bruen.
The hearing, conducted in an informal manner as described by Apfelbaum, involved some contentious moments, particularly regarding the recognition of Fuller’s nonbinary identity. Although Apfelbaum endeavored to address Fuller respectfully, there were instances of misgendering, for which he apologized.
Fuller’s testimony painted a different picture, arguing that they were not given adequate support and resources to perform their job effectively. They denied being disruptive, instead portraying themselves as actively seeking assistance and clarification in their role. Fuller emphasized their commitment to the job and the lack of proper representation and support from Mazzoni’s union.
Following the hearing, Apfelbaum apologized to Fuller for any oversight regarding their nonbinary status, assuring them of his best efforts in understanding their situation. In response to the appeal, Mazzoni Center maintains that Fuller’s separation was justified and supported by just cause, describing the case as bearing out this conclusion.
The appeal filed by Fuller’s attorneys challenges the referee’s decision and underscores ongoing concerns about workplace equity and inclusivity, particularly for nonbinary individuals. The case highlights the complexities of navigating employment disputes while also advocating for recognition and fair treatment of nonbinary and LGBTQ+ employees in the workplace.